Background: In tri-axial trunk accelerometry for assessing fall risk, the most common protocol consists of walking a fixed distance (e.g. 18 m.) on a straight line. Autocorrelation-based step-symmetry is an often used feature. Aim: To investigate differences in a new correlation-based feature in elderly according to fall risk. Methods: Forty elderly (>=70 years old) with increased fall risk (history of falls and/or Timed-Get-Up-and-Go-Test >15s and/or Tinetti-test Results: ICX0 is significantly different between the two groups (p=0.0017)in contrast to CC1 and CC2 (p=0.30 and p=0.77). However, |1- CC1| is significantly different (p=0.0015) as well as |1- CC2| (p=0.0018). Pearson's Correlation between CC1 and CC2 is low (R2=0.55). No significant relationship between ICX0 and CC1, CC2 or walking speed was found (respectively R2=0.017, R2=0.013 and R2=0.29). Conclusions: We propose ICX0 as a new outcome for assessing fall risk in elderly persons, which seems independent of walking speed and - although conceptually similar -not related to craniocaudal step symmetry.
Jansen, B, Bautmans, I, Van Keymolen, B, Deklerck, R & Mets, T 2010, 'An alternative correlation based feature for measuring step symmetry for assessing fall risk in elderly persons', Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 16, no. s1, pp. 68-68.
Jansen, B., Bautmans, I., Van Keymolen, B., Deklerck, R., & Mets, T. (2010). An alternative correlation based feature for measuring step symmetry for assessing fall risk in elderly persons. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 16(s1), 68-68.
@article{a368ea8117354077aac651643016d59a,
title = "An alternative correlation based feature for measuring step symmetry for assessing fall risk in elderly persons",
abstract = "Background: In tri-axial trunk accelerometry for assessing fall risk, the most common protocol consists of walking a fixed distance (e.g. 18 m.) on a straight line. Autocorrelation-based step-symmetry is an often used feature. Aim: To investigate differences in a new correlation-based feature in elderly according to fall risk. Methods: Forty elderly (>=70 years old) with increased fall risk (history of falls and/or Timed-Get-Up-and-Go-Test >15s and/or Tinetti-test Results: ICX0 is significantly different between the two groups (p=0.0017)in contrast to CC1 and CC2 (p=0.30 and p=0.77). However, |1- CC1| is significantly different (p=0.0015) as well as |1- CC2| (p=0.0018). Pearson's Correlation between CC1 and CC2 is low (R2=0.55). No significant relationship between ICX0 and CC1, CC2 or walking speed was found (respectively R2=0.017, R2=0.013 and R2=0.29). Conclusions: We propose ICX0 as a new outcome for assessing fall risk in elderly persons, which seems independent of walking speed and - although conceptually similar -not related to craniocaudal step symmetry.",
keywords = "frailty, elderly, gait analysis, accelerometry, fall",
author = "Bart Jansen and Ivan Bautmans and {Van Keymolen}, Bart and Rudi Deklerck and Tony Mets",
year = "2010",
month = feb,
day = "26",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "68--68",
journal = "Parkinsonism and Related Disorders",
issn = "1353-8020",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "s1",
note = "3rd International Congress on Gait & Mental Function ; Conference date: 26-02-2010 Through 28-02-2010",
}